Archive for October, 2010

Macrowikinomics: The Choice Between Atrophy or Renaissance

Monday, October 11th, 2010

NWC Authors Don Tapscott and Anthony Williams, The Huffington Post, Sept. 28, 2010

The global economic crisis should be a wakeup call to the world. We need to rethink and rebuild many of the organizations and institutions that have served us well for decades, but now have come to the end of their life cycle. This is more than a recession or the aftermath of a financial crisis. We are at a turning point in history.

Let’s face it. The world is broken and the industrial economy and many of its industries and organizations have finally run out of gas, from newspapers and old models of financial services to our energy grid, transportation systems and institutions for global cooperation and problem solving.

At the same time the contours of a new kind of civilization are becoming clear as millions of connected citizens begin to forge alternative institutions using the Web as a platform for innovation and value creation. From education and science and to new approaches to citizen engagement and democracy, powerful new initiatives are underway, embracing a new set of principles for the 21st century — collaboration, openness, sharing, interdependence and integrity. Indeed, with the proliferation of social media and social networks, we believe society has at its disposal the most powerful platform ever for bringing together the people, skills and knowledge we need to ensure growth, social development and a just and sustainable world.

Of course, the sparkling possibilities described above contrast sharply with the stagnation and inertia that grips so many contemporary institutions. The harsh reality is that it will take years and probably decades to undo some the damage done by misguided policies and approaches. When the economy crashed in 2008, for example, it cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars. Faced with a historic market meltdown, the worst recession in three generations, plus government guarantees that exceed the cost of every war the U.S. has ever fought, American taxpayers are understandably still furious.

Read the full article here.

Gordon Gekko’s Skewed New Value..

Sunday, October 10th, 2010

NWC Author John Kao, The Daily Beast on Oct. 2, 2010

Gone is the clear moral universe of Oliver Stone’s hero in the Wall Street sequel. Now we’ve got a humble reformed crook who’s also a sleek alpha male. John Kao on Gekko’s crisis of indecision.

Gordon Gekko can’t seem to make up his mind. And because of that, we the viewers have an equally hard time making up our minds about him in Oliver Stone’s new sequel to his 1987 hit film Wall Street.

If the original Wall Street was a portrait of an era, its moral universe was relatively clearly drawn. Blue Star good, corporate raider bad. Penthouse good, insider trading bad. Bud Fox straps on wings and flies too close to the Gekko sun. Hubris leads to a fall. Contemporary art and willowy blondes only take you so far, it turns out. Malefactors are punished. The universe is restored to balance.

This time, Gekko is a repentant father longing to make amends to win his daughter’s approval who also essentially steals a fortune from her to get back in the game.

Gekko is a humble reformed crook who has paid his debt to society and also a sleek alpha male puffing on a phallic cigar who can’t wait to gloat about his prowess at making money.

Gekko is a teacher who shares his knowledge. At times, one could swear that one had wandered into a parallel universe version of An Inconvenient Truth, as Gekko lectures us on the hazards of leverage and financial meltdown. Particularly priceless is when he calls a group of young students “ninjas”—no income, no job, no assets—adding, “You have a lot to look forward to.” But the same guy who observes that the mother of all evil is speculation turns up later in the film dressed in a power suit and giddy over his ability to turn $100 million into $1 billion. I don’t think he earned it at $25 an hour; leverage must have figured in there somewhere.

If we fast-forward 23 years to Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, we are treated to a curiously different kind of moral equation, the morality of “and also” rather than “either or.”